{"id":2045,"date":"2026-07-27T14:50:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T18:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/?p=2045"},"modified":"2026-07-27T05:00:27","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T09:00:27","slug":"25-story-tower-wood-rose-above","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/25-story-tower-wood-rose-above\/2045\/","title":{"rendered":"Milwaukee spent 5 years arguing about a mass timber tower, and the number that finally settled it came out of a fire lab in Madison instead of a city council chamber"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Picture a 25 story apartment tower rising above downtown Milwaukee.<\/p>\n<p>Now picture that&nbsp;<strong>nineteen floors<\/strong>&nbsp;of it are made of wood.<\/p>\n<p>Not trim and not paneling, but the actual skeleton, the columns and the beams and the floors themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Most people assume a wood tower that tall sits one stray spark away from disaster.<\/p>\n<p>What settled that question happened inside a laboratory in Madison, and the result surprised&nbsp;<strong>seasoned engineers<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h2>A building nobody thought the city would allow<\/h2>\n<p>In 2017, Milwaukee developer Tim Gokhman came across a concept study for an 80 story high rise framed in wood.<\/p>\n<p>The design was called River Beech Tower, and it was never built.<\/p>\n<p>He decided to build one of his own anyway.<\/p>\n<p>What followed was a five year fight through permits, engineering reviews and fire codes that nobody had written with a wooden skyscraper in mind.<\/p>\n<p>The city had&nbsp;<strong>no rulebook<\/strong>&nbsp;for this.<\/p>\n<p>Nobody did.<\/p>\n<p>The building, called Ascent, had to prove it could meet the same fire safety standards as a concrete or steel tower before a single approval came through.<\/p>\n<p>That proof had to come from measured&nbsp;<strong>data<\/strong>&nbsp;rather than from a hunch.<\/p>\n<h2>The material that surprises every engineer who tests it<\/h2>\n<p>Mass timber is not the thin framing lumber inside a typical house.<\/p>\n<p>Two products matter here, and they are built differently.<\/p>\n<p>Cross laminated timber stacks boards in alternating directions and bonds them into panels, which is what makes a floor stiff in both axes.<\/p>\n<p>Glue laminated timber, or glulam, runs its laminations&nbsp;<strong>the same direction<\/strong>, which is what lets a column carry load straight down its length.<\/p>\n<p>Ascent uses both.<\/p>\n<p>Glulam is not as strong as steel in absolute terms, and any structural engineer will say so plainly.<\/p>\n<p>What it offers is a remarkable ratio of strength to weight, and that ratio changes everything below ground.<\/p>\n<p>A lighter building needs&nbsp;<strong>fewer piles<\/strong>&nbsp;driven less deep.<\/p>\n<p>Shallower foundations mean shorter excavation, which cut weeks off the early schedule.<\/p>\n<h2>What fire actually does to a wood wall<\/h2>\n<p>Here is what most people expect: wood burns, so a wood building burns faster.<\/p>\n<p>Here is what actually happens.<\/p>\n<p>The outer surface of a heavy timber member turns to charcoal.<\/p>\n<p>That char layer insulates the wood underneath it.<\/p>\n<p>The interior stays cool enough to keep carrying load long after most observers assume it has already failed.<\/p>\n<p>Steel does not char.<\/p>\n<p>Steel loses strength and deforms as temperatures climb, while a thick wood column&nbsp;<strong>buys time<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>That difference matters enormously when firefighters need a window to work inside a burning structure.<\/p>\n<p>The open question was never whether char protects the core, but&nbsp;<strong>how fast<\/strong>&nbsp;it eats inward.<\/p>\n<h2>The number that came out of the fire lab<\/h2>\n<p>To leave roughly half the timber structure exposed inside the finished building, the team had to show Ascent could meet Type I standards.<\/p>\n<p>Working with the Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, they ran the world&#8217;s first three hour glulam column fire test.<\/p>\n<p>Douglas fir, black spruce and Austrian spruce all went into the chamber.<\/p>\n<p>American code assumes wood chars at a nominal 1.5 inches per hour, and that assumption had only been validated out to two hours.<\/p>\n<p>The columns charred&nbsp;<strong>more slowly<\/strong>&nbsp;than that, at roughly 1.3 inches per hour across the full three, according to the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fpl.fs.usda.gov\/documnts\/pdf2021\/fpl_2021_hasburgh001.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">published results<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The wood burned back slower than the rulebook demanded.<\/p>\n<p>The columns met or exceeded the required rating, and the code figure was confirmed as&nbsp;<strong>deliberately conservative<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The project drew support from the Wood Innovations program, and the findings were released publicly for anyone designing the next tower.<\/p>\n<p>Hardware evidence of that kind decides whether a project happens at all, much as an&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/ecoportal.net\/en\/an-offshore-wind-farm-in-the-north-sea\/28240\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">offshore project<\/a>&nbsp;lives or dies on the equipment available to build it.<\/p>\n<h2>Why the Milwaukee record did not last, and why that is the point<\/h2>\n<p>Ascent opened in July 2022 with 259 apartments across 493,000 square feet in the Yankee Hill neighborhood.<\/p>\n<p>At 284 feet it took the world record for a mass timber building.<\/p>\n<p>It does not hold that record anymore.<\/p>\n<p>Atlassian Central in Sydney topped out in July 2026 at 591 feet across 39 floors, more than doubling the Milwaukee mark, as&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/newatlas.com\/architecture\/atlassian-central-timber-tower-tops-out\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">architecture coverage<\/a>&nbsp;reported.<\/p>\n<p>Milwaukee is not standing still either.<\/p>\n<p>The Edison broke ground in the same city in June 2025, aiming to become the tallest mass timber tower in the Western Hemisphere.<\/p>\n<p>Every one of those projects rests on public test data that did not exist before Ascent forced the question.<\/p>\n<p>One honest caveat remains, because timber frames still carry a&nbsp;<strong>cost premium<\/strong>&nbsp;over reinforced concrete.<\/p>\n<p>Closing that gap needs more projects and more shared engineering, the way public argument around a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/ecoportal.net\/en\/fox-lost-wild-home-solar-panels\/24938\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">solar site<\/a>&nbsp;usually outlives the technical questions.<\/p>\n<p>Mass timber also locks carbon captured from the atmosphere for as long as the building stands.<\/p>\n<p>The record moved on within four years, and the reason it could move sits in a&nbsp;<strong>laboratory report<\/strong>&nbsp;from Wisconsin.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Picture a 25 story apartment tower rising above downtown Milwaukee. Now picture that&nbsp;nineteen floors&nbsp;of it are made of wood. Not trim and not paneling, but the actual skeleton, the columns and the beams and the floors themselves. Most people assume a wood tower that tall sits one stray spark away from disaster. What settled that &#8230; <a title=\"Milwaukee spent 5 years arguing about a mass timber tower, and the number that finally settled it came out of a fire lab in Madison instead of a city council chamber\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/25-story-tower-wood-rose-above\/2045\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Milwaukee spent 5 years arguing about a mass timber tower, and the number that finally settled it came out of a fire lab in Madison instead of a city council chamber\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2083,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-construction"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2045"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2084,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2045\/revisions\/2084"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ecoportal.net\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}