News

Crews poured 5 metric tons of spent coffee grounds into a Victorian footpath, and the coffee biochar concrete that cured in the street matched ordinary concrete instead of beating it by 30 percent

By SEP 24, 2026 1:50 PM 6 MIN READ
Coffee biochar concrete being poured into a footpath in Pakenham, dark granules visible in wet mixPhoto: Pete Glenane, HiVis Pictures

On McGregor Road in Pakenham, Victoria, a crew poured a stretch of footpath that looked like ordinary concrete.

It was not ordinary.

Mixed into the grey slurry was spent coffee biochar, replacing part of the river sand that concrete normally needs.

The lab result behind it promised concrete 30 percent stronger than the standard mix.

What commercial kilns could actually deliver was something else, and that gap is the real story.

Why raw grounds cannot go straight into the mix

Coffee grounds are organic matter, and organic matter rots. Dropped straight into a mix, the waste would decompose over time and weaken the building material, which is why the used coffee is converted into biochar before it ever reaches the cement. The chemistry that makes concrete durable is the same chemistry that makes raw grounds a slow acting threat inside it.

The fix is heat without air. Researchers heated the grounds to 662°F in a low energy process without oxygen, a step called pyrolysis, which chars the organic material into a rigid, porous carbon called biochar. Biological activity stops, and what remains is a granular material that can hold water in its pores and release it back into the curing cement.

That water holding behavior is the part the researchers lean on. As concrete cures, internal moisture drives the hydration reaction, and porous biochar acts like a tiny reservoir inside the slab. In the laboratory, the best mix gained 29.3 percent in strength under load compared with an ordinary mix using plain sand, and the open question was whether that effect would survive the jump from bench to job site.

What 140,000 coffees look like on a job site

For the Pakenham Roads Upgrade, a specialist processing company collected and converted the grounds. Five metric tons of spent coffee, about 140,000 coffees’ worth, became 2 metric tons of useable biochar. That material went into a 39.6 cubic yard footpath laid along McGregor Road, a conversion ratio of roughly two and a half to one, with water and volatile compounds driven off by the kiln.

The contractor estimated the pour diverted 140,000 coffees from landfill and saved more than 3 metric tons of sand. River sand is not a trivial commodity. Australia generates 75 million kilograms of ground coffee waste every year, about 165 million pounds, and the research team estimates that stream could replace up to 655 million kilograms of sand in concrete.

The McGregor Road pour marked the first time the innovation had been used in a major Victorian infrastructure project. Before it came a smaller residential footpath in Gisborne, described as a world first coffee concrete footpath trial. Pakenham was the step up to road building scale.

The gap between the lab result and the field result

Here is where the story turns. The biochar used in the field work could not be produced at the laboratory’s optimal temperature because of limitations with the commercial scale production equipment. The material for the trial was made at around 842°F rather than the lab optimal 662°F, and against the control mix, the field trial concrete showed slight reductions of 6 percent at seven days and 9.3 percent at 28 days.

In practical terms the footpath performs like a normal footpath rather than a stronger one. Because the team could not use its low energy process to produce the biochar, the coffee biochar concrete in the trial had a similar strength to standard concrete. The sand it displaced is genuinely saved, but the strength premium that made the research famous did not cross the threshold from lab to street.

Temperature is the lever. Pyrolysis conditions govern the pore structure of the char, and the researchers note that coffee based biochar may have different optimal pyrolysis conditions compared with other biomass sources. What they point to is not a new formula but a better calibrated kiln that can hold its setting at production speed.

What the researchers say happens next

The problem is a familiar one: a result tuned for laboratory conditions often softens when it meets commercial equipment on a job site schedule. Supply chain limitations meant the biochar had to be produced through a higher energy process, and closing that gap is now the engineering target rather than reformulating the mix.

Samples cored from the slab at 54 days of curing showed relatively better results than samples taken from the fresh concrete at the time of the pour and cured off site. The team’s reading is that beyond 28 days, water saturation within the biochar particles helps further hydration of cement particles, an interpretation of the field data rather than a settled mechanism. That delayed effect matters because it means the full performance of a coffee biochar slab may not be readable on the usual 28 day test schedule.

The work also won The Problem Solver category at the Shaping Australia Awards, which recognizes research that has transformed, or holds the potential to transform, lives for the better, in this case through the use of recycled material in everyday construction. A separate team working on low carbon cement found that testing one cement recipe means waiting 28 days for it to cure, a delay that shows just how hard it is to accelerate any concrete innovation from bench to street.

The bigger number waiting behind the footpath

Forty cubic yards of footpath is a small thing. But the arithmetic behind it is not. The world uses 50 billion tons of sand and gravel each year, making it the second most used natural resource worldwide after water, roughly 55 billion US tons.

Taking that material from rivers and coastal ecosystems can drive erosion, salinize aquifers, remove storm surge protection and hit biodiversity. Coffee biochar is much lighter than the sand it stands in for, so a modest mass of grounds displaces a far larger mass of aggregate. Australia’s annual coffee waste alone could stand in for up to 655 million kilograms of sand, roughly 1.4 billion pounds that would otherwise come out of a river somewhere.

Whether that potential is realized depends on whether kilns can close the gap between what 662°F does on a bench and what a commercial pyrolysis unit can hold on a production run. The footpath on McGregor Road is in service. Beneath its surface, 2 metric tons of what was once 140,000 morning coffees sits cured into the slab, holding its own against plain concrete, waiting for the next batch to arrive a little stronger.

Hugo Rojas Tech Editor & Advisor

Hugo Rojas is an editor and science writer who turns complex research into clear, engaging stories. With a sharp eye for detail and a love for the natural world, energy, and technology, he brings big ideas down to earth for every reader.