A closed hydraulic loop hums inside a research lab in Holden, Massachusetts.
Water drives a runner built with only three blades.
It turns slower than almost any turbine its size.
Technicians release live fish into the flow upstream of it.
They are watching for blood, for torn scales, for anything that gives away a strike.
The longest, most awkward looking animals in the lineup came out the least bothered of all, and that result raised an obvious question: why?
Three blades and a slower spin change what a strike feels like
Conventional runners are crowded with metal. A Francis turbine carries 12 to 16 blades and a Kaplan five or six, because narrow blades moving fast squeeze the most electricity out of a given flow. That efficiency is punishing for anything swimming through, since a thin, fast blade meeting a fish behaves more like a knife than a paddle.
Engineers at a hydraulics research laboratory flipped that trade, building a corkscrew shaped runner with just three blades. It has no gaps, is large, and rotates more slowly. Fewer blades mean fewer chances for a fish to be in the wrong place as the runner turns, and a slower blade arrives with less force behind it.
Rather than estimating what happens in that split second from a model, the lab measured it directly. Fish were put into the turbine test loop upstream of the runner, then recovered and examined, so passage related injury and survival could be counted fish by fish rather than inferred.
That distinction matters more once the actual numbers come in.
Eels survived at 99 percent, outlasting every other species tested
Several species went through the loop, including rainbow trout, alewife, smallmouth bass, coho salmon, American eel and white sturgeon. Length is normally the variable that decides the outcome, because the longer the fish, the greater the chance of being struck by a blade. At conventional plants, eels pay heavily for that length.
Here the ranking inverted. Reporting on the test program notes that with typical turbines eel survival usually trails smaller fish, but with this turbine American eels had the highest survival rate of any species run through it. Counting post passage holding, the smaller eels survived at 100 percent and the 18 inch eels at about 99 percent. That is a different pattern than body length alone predicts.
Researchers tie it to body form. The eel is long, flexible, sinuous and lacking scales, and posted significantly higher survival than the other species. Scaleless sturgeon also did well, and like eels they are less prone to secondary infection afterward. The idea that a slender body bends around a slow blade instead of being caught squarely is an interpretation of the survival data, not a directly measured mechanism.
A 2,000 horsepower pump ran the 2001 trials behind the numbers
The pilot scale biological evaluation ran in 2001 and 2002 under a federal advanced hydropower turbine program, the first such evaluation of this kind, using a closed loop system driven by a 2,000 horsepower pump. Scaled up, record breaking operation of the full size turbine is expected to push passage survival above 98 percent for many fish. “Fish passage survival is truly the measure of success of the Alden turbine,” said Tim Hogan, a fisheries biologist who worked on the project.
Development did not stop at one encouraging result. Later work reshaped the hydraulic passageways, including the spiral case, distributor, runner and draft tube. A scaled physical model was then tested at a hydraulics laboratory in York, Pennsylvania, giving peak efficiency of 91.85 percent, which translates to a maximum calculated prototype efficiency of 93.64 percent. That stage measured hydraulics, not fish.
Decades old dams still carry a problem this design targets
Downstream fish passage and turbine entrainment remain a leading environmental concern at hydropower projects, repeated at dam after dam regardless of size or region. Other labs have chased the same target with entirely different shapes.
One is a propeller style runner built specifically for fish safety. A total of 131 eels passed through it, and 48 hour survival came back at 100 percent, with no major internal or external injuries recorded, against conventional Kaplan and Francis turbines where eel survival may range from 40 to 95 percent, according to the published study.
Materials work runs alongside the hydraulics. Elsewhere in renewable energy, engineers are tackling waste at the other end of a turbine’s life, including blade material recovered and strengthened after its working life ends, and recovery efforts such as the balsa wood recovered from retired wind turbine blades. The three bladed runner is one entry in a crowded field, not a lone breakthrough.
A canceled demo site leaves the design lab tested, not river tested
A laboratory loop is forgiving in ways a river never is. Debris, temperature swings, variable flow and species nobody tested for all complicate the leap to a working dam, and regulators ask for field proof before approving any retrofit.
That proof has been slow arriving. An initial demonstration site was canceled for economic reasons unrelated to the turbine’s cost, and a planned installation at another project site was never pursued. The design remains model tested rather than river tested.
Even so, the direction of the finding is hard to dismiss. A slower, simpler looking wheel protected the animal that conventional runners handle worst, and it did so in a test where the fish were counted one by one rather than modeled. If that holds once steel turns in a real river, it offers something hydropower has needed for a long time.
Read the whole thing?
Get the week's signal, not the noise
Our sharpest reporting on energy, climate and nature — free, once a week.
