New York --:--
Magazine about Earth, Science and Energy
Energy

Sewage ash heated with chlorine gas and carbon near 1,830 degrees Fahrenheit released 75 percent of its phosphorus as a gas, the nutrient that incineration normally locks into a form plain heat cannot release

By OCT 9, 2026 5:50 PM 4 MIN READ
Lab reactor pulling phosphorus from burned sewage ash using chlorine gas and carbon, sewage ash heated Lab reactor pulling phosphorus
Stay in the loopFollow us on Google News→

Inside a Japanese treatment plant, truckloads of sludge get burned down to ash.

The leftover powder looks like cold gray dust.

For decades, much of it went straight to a landfill.

Locked inside is a nutrient every farm on Earth needs and the world is running short of.

Chemical engineers in Sapporo decided to open that ash back up.

The question was whether chlorine gas and fire could pull the phosphorus free without dragging toxic metals along with it.

Why phosphorus hides in ash when almost nothing else survives the fire

Most of what goes into a sludge furnace burns away as gas or settles as ordinary ash.

Phosphorus behaves differently. It binds tightly to calcium, iron and aluminum inside the ash, forming minerals stable enough that plain heat leaves them where they are. Chlorine on its own does not change that much: when the ash was chlorinated without carbon, iron and potassium came off between roughly 1,290 and 1,470 degrees Fahrenheit while no phosphorus volatilized at all .

Adding carbon flips the chemistry. In carbo-chlorination, the carbon acts as a reducing agent, stripping the oxygen that holds phosphorus to calcium and letting the element react with chlorine and leave the solid as a gas instead.

That gas is collected as phosphorus chloride. The researchers describe phosphorus being recovered in phosphorus chloride forms that can also be converted to phosphoric acid , the same raw material fertilizer makers normally make from mined rock.

What makes a pile of ash start to look like ore

Sewage ash is not a clean material to begin with. It carries cadmium, lead and other metals absorbed from whatever washed down a city’s drains, which is why limits on heavy metals constrain what can be spread on farmland. Separating phosphorus from those metals without creating a new contaminated byproduct is the harder half of the problem.

The appeal is that ash headed for a landfill starts acting like ore instead. Mineable phosphate is concentrated in very few places: U.S. Geological Survey figures put Morocco’s reserves at 50 billion tons out of a world total near 74 billion . Japan has no phosphate rock industry of its own, so a domestic source sitting inside city limits carries a different kind of appeal.

What the bench test actually did

The work came from chemical engineers Yuuki Mochizuki and Naoto Tsubouchi at Hokkaido University’s Center for Advanced Research of Energy and Materials , who ran sewage sludge incineration ash through a flow-type fixed-bed reactor with chlorine gas and published the results in Resources, Conservation and Recycling. The ash came from sludge of the kind burned in large quantities for power generation and volume reduction .

The best result came from two steps rather than one. The ash was first chlorinated at about 1,830 degrees Fahrenheit with a 30-minute hold, then carbon was added to that residue, and phosphorus began leaving at roughly 1,470 degrees Fahrenheit at 10 percent before reaching a 75 percent volatilization rate at about 1,830 degrees .

A single-step version, with carbon mixed in from the start, did less. Iron, phosphorus and silicon all volatilized from lower temperatures, hitting 80, 55 and 35 percent respectively at the same top temperature . Each element leaves the solid at its own point, which is what makes separation possible at all.

Mochizuki said the approach can be run with “lower energy requirements, lower CO2 emissions, and lower cost than conventional phosphorus recovery technologies” based on phosphate ores.

What still stands between a reactor tube and a treatment plant

None of it works at scale yet. The reactor processes grams, not tons, and turning a laboratory tube into something a treatment plant runs every day is still an open engineering problem.

Selectivity also costs something. Holding the sample at the higher temperatures drove more phosphorus off, but aluminum, magnesium and silicon came with it , which means a real plant would face a trade-off between yield and purity. Chlorine gas is not a casual material either, and any full-scale version would need the containment and safety systems used at industrial chemical works.

Mining the things that were already thrown out

That kind of thinking echoes other efforts to pull value out of material nobody wanted twice, the same instinct that led crews to grind retired wind turbine blades into lighter concrete blocks for a retaining wall rather than send them to a landfill. Recovery efforts elsewhere follow a similar pattern, much like a solar recycling plant near Dallas recovering silver and copper that most recyclers still send to landfills.

Even at bench scale, the numbers point somewhere real. A nutrient that ash used to bury for good came out of the solid three times in four under the right conditions, and that alone changes what a pile of gray powder is worth.

Read the whole thing?

Get the week's signal, not the noise

Our sharpest reporting on energy, climate and nature — free, once a week.

Share this article
Hugo_writer
Hugo RojasTech Editor & Advisor
Hugo is an engineer with strong technical expertise and deep knowledge of the space industry. Multilingual from an early age, his writing combines technical clarity with a strong interest in science and energy.