A tub of slushy ice water sits in a climate controlled chamber on a Colorado campus.
Beside it, a body bag that can be filled with ice.
On a cart, ice sheets and sealed ice packs.
A volunteer wired with temperature sensors is about to be heated on purpose, then cooled by one of five methods.
The question behind the work is simple.
When a body overheats, what actually brings it back down fastest?
A shivering reflex can fight its own rescue
The physiology behind the experiment comes down to one reflex. When skin meets cold water, the body narrows blood vessels near the surface and can start to shiver, both responses that conserve heat rather than shed it. That is useful in a cold lake and unhelpful in someone who needs to lose heat quickly.
At the University of Colorado Colorado Springs, inside the William J. Hybl Sports Medicine and Performance Center, graduate student Lauren Pruden is putting the body’s heat response to the test in the hope of improving how hyperthermia is treated in emergency departments. She has pointed to the shiver response in particular, saying that for some participants it has been “detrimental to their cooling and they aren’t able to cool as quickly as other people.”
Whether that shivering effect holds across larger groups is one of the things the lab is still working out, so it is best read as an observation under investigation rather than a settled rule. The chamber is built to separate effects like that one.
It can adjust altitude, temperature and humidity to mimic different atmospheres, which lets researchers watch an overheated body respond to rescue methods under conditions they control exactly.
Five cooling methods go head to head in one chamber
Inside that room, the study tests several cooling interventions, including a body bag filled with ice that the participant lies in, an ice tub for whole body immersion, ice sheets placed over the body, ice packs and passive cooling with no intervention. Each of the five approaches is tested under matched conditions.
Participants are outfitted with sensors that measure body temperature, skin temperature and core temperature. That distinction matters, because a method that feels cold against the skin is not necessarily moving heat out of the core.
Safety sets the ceiling on the whole thing. Keeping each participant’s internal body temperature at a safe level is critical, since readings above about 102 degrees Fahrenheit can become unsafe.
The room itself stays plain, a tub, some ice and a handful of sensors, nothing a well stocked hospital bay could not already have on a shelf.
Ice water cooled hyperthermic runners twice as fast
The Colorado trials have not reported a winner yet, but the wider literature has. In a field comparison of 21 hyperthermic distance runners, volunteers were treated either by ice water immersion at roughly 34 to 37 degrees Fahrenheit or by air exposure while wrapped in wet towels. The mean cooling rates differed sharply, 0.36 degrees per minute for immersion against 0.20 degrees for air exposure, roughly twice as fast.
A later international review pooled the published trials and reached the same conclusion from a different direction. Water immersion of adults with exertional hyperthermia, in cold, colder or ice water, produced faster cooling than passive cooling, with no single water temperature range clearly beating another.
Immersion also outpaced other active methods such as commercial ice packs, cold showers, evaporative cooling, ice sheets and towels, and fanning. Full immersion works on simple physics rather than anything exotic, since a tub surrounds the limbs and torso at once and keeps cold water pressed against every inch of skin, while packs and sheets only touch patches that warm quickly.
A 10 minute tarp bath works in the field, not as a replacement
None of this requires a hospital. Researchers have tested an improvised version, tarp assisted cooling, performed with 20 gallons of water and 10 gallons of ice poured onto a tarp. Cooling time to a rectal temperature of 100.85 degrees Fahrenheit was far faster with the tarp than with passive cooling, about 10 minutes against roughly 43.
It is not sold as a substitute for a tub. The authors framed it as a field expedient alternative in the absence of a stationary method such as cold water immersion, which is the honest version of the claim. A separate sealed lab trial in which volunteers slept wired to monitors for several nights shows the same pattern of plain setups being tested against elaborate ones.
Immersion is not always practical either. A patient who is unconscious, injured or needs continuous monitoring may not tolerate being submerged, which is part of why sheets and packs remain common in ambulances.
Altitude adds a twist the Colorado chamber can test
The Colorado Springs work has particular relevance in its own state, where altitude and climate can create additional challenges for regulating body temperature. The chamber lets researchers test combinations that would be far riskier to study during a real emergency, the same way a sealed heat chamber trial let volunteers pedal under controlled watch.
None of this makes packs or blankets useless. They are better than nothing, and in settings where a tub cannot travel they still matter. Pruden plans to attend medical school with the goal of becoming an emergency medicine physician, and an account of the chamber work appears in a university research feature.
The simplest image from the project may be the truest one. A body protecting itself from cold water is, in this narrow circumstance, working against its own rescue, and the best documented fix is still enough ice and a big enough tub.
Read the whole thing?
Get the week's signal, not the noise
Our sharpest reporting on energy, climate and nature — free, once a week.
