New York --:--
For Companies
Energy

Crews dropped two layers of rock around 54 turbine foundations off New York, and the reef nobody designed has a measured radius of about 330 feet

By SEP 3, 2026 3:50 PM 5 MIN READ
A camera rig on rock beside one of the turbine foundations A camera rig on rock beside one
Stay in the loopFollow us on Google News

The seabed off Long Island is sand, and it goes on like that for miles.

Rippled, featureless, and thin on anything that needs somewhere to hide.

Then a crew drops a bed of quarried rock onto it, and a few months later a steel tube lands in the middle.

Within a season the rock is furred over and the sand at its edge is a different place.

Nobody specified that.

The rock was there to stop the seabed washing away.

Why a hard object changes a soft bottom

Open sand is a poor habitat for most fish. There is little to shelter under and almost nothing for filter feeders to attach to.

Put something hard on it and the sequence starts immediately.

Barnacles, mussels and hydroids settle on the surface within weeks. Crabs and small crustaceans move into the gaps between the stones.

Small fish arrive for the shelter and the invertebrates, and larger fish arrive for the small fish.

The current does its part too. Flow accelerating around a vertical column scours a pit at the base and stacks food along the eddies behind it.

Which is why the interesting object here is not the steel. It is the rock apron spread around its foot.

What is actually sitting on that seabed

These turbine foundations are single steel monopiles, each one driven into the bottom rather than bolted to a frame.

Before the pile goes in, a filter layer of rock is laid on the sand. After it is installed, a second layer of smaller armor rock goes on top.

That two layer bed exists to stop the current from digging the foundation out, and it is a purely engineering measure with no ecological purpose.

It is also a rock reef, in a place that had none, built to a specification and repeated 54 times.

The machines above it are 15 megawatt units with rotors 774 feet across and a tip height of 886 feet.

All of that is engineering. The habitat underneath is a side effect.

What the cameras measured, and where

The number came from a Scottish wind farm rather than a New York one.

A team dropped baited stereo camera rigs at four distances from turbine bases, at roughly 100, 200, 400 and 800 feet, across 24 foundations.

Ninety six deployments in total, counting and measuring whatever came into frame.

Fish biomass at the closest distance ran about 1.5 to 1.6 times what it was at the farthest, with dab and haddock leading the count.

The effect faded steadily with distance and was largely gone by around 330 feet, which puts a radius on something usually described in adjectives. Beyond that the seabed reads as ordinary sand again.

That work was published in a marine science journal in the spring of 2026, and it is the first study to put a fine scale number on an effect the industry has been describing loosely for twenty years.

What a fish count does not prove

The oldest argument in artificial reef research is attraction against production.

More fish at a structure can mean the structure is making more fish, or it can mean the same fish have relocated from the surrounding sand and are now easier to find and easier to catch.

A camera cannot tell those apart, and neither can a single season. If the fish have only moved, a wind farm is not producing anything, it is concentrating what exists and making it easier to catch.

It is also one farm in one sea, with jacket foundations rather than monopiles, and a fish community that is not the New York one. Dab and haddock are not the species that would show up off Long Island.

The pattern is consistent with what has been found before, including cod moving into a 100 turbine farm elsewhere, and consistency is not proof.

What the camera survey genuinely adds is a distance rather than an impression.

Where the steel came from and what happens next

The components staged out of a 73 acre terminal on the Brooklyn waterfront, a working container dock rebuilt as an assembly yard with heavy lift capacity and a warehouse behind it.

The project runs to 810 megawatts across those 54 machines, 15 to 30 miles off New York, and is expected to supply more than 500,000 homes.

All 54 foundations went into the seabed across the summer and fall of 2025, and the offshore substation followed in January of 2026.

First power is targeted for late 2026 with full operation in 2027, and more than a thousand union jobs are tied to the terminal.

Every one of those foundations arrived with its own rock bed, so the habitat went in before the electricity did, the same way mooring hardware on the other coast is already being read for what lives on it.

The rock layers were a scour calculation.

What grew on them was never on the drawing.

Read the whole thing?

Get the week's signal, not the noise

Our sharpest reporting on energy, climate and nature — free, once a week.

Share this article
Hugo_writer
Hugo is an engineer with strong technical expertise and deep knowledge of the space industry. Multilingual from an early age, his writing combines technical clarity with a strong interest in science and energy.