New York --:--
Magazine about Earth, Science and Energy
Climate

Greenland iceberg larger than Manhattan survived island collision and continued drifting south

By SEP 26, 2026 11:55 AM 5 MIN READ
NASA Earth Observatory Lauren Dauphin Credits: NASA Earth Observatory/Lauren Dauphin
Stay in the loopFollow us on Google News→

Greenland’s newest giant iceberg survived a collision with a remote Arctic island and kept drifting south as scientists tracked its every move.

In August 2026, a slab of ice larger than St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands quietly fractured from Greenland’s Petermann Glacier and began drifting south at roughly three kilometers a day. Ahead of it lay Nares Strait — narrow, unforgiving — and a small rocky island sitting directly in its path.

Scientists already had their eyes on it. What they weren’t sure about was what the collision would do.

The calving that caught scientists off guard

Adam Garbo wasn’t expecting what he found on August 4, 2026. The doctoral student in glaciology at the University of Ottawa was scanning ESA Sentinel-1 satellite imagery when he spotted it: a freshly calved ice island, just over 76 square kilometers, had broken away from Petermann Glacier — the largest piece to separate from Petermann since 2012.

The twist? It wasn’t the break anyone had been watching for.

Garbo and his colleagues had been monitoring a prominent rift that looked likely to cut across the entire ice tongue and produce an even larger chunk. Instead, the glacier fractured along a different crack entirely. “What surprised us was that the calving instead followed a different fracture, producing a smaller ice island than we had originally anticipated,” Garbo said. Two major rifts still remain on the glacier, and researchers expect them to eventually release new ice islands of roughly 94 and 84 square kilometers — though when that happens is anyone’s guess.

Why Petermann Glacier matters beyond the calving event

Petermann is one of Greenland’s largest marine-terminating glaciers, acting as a kind of valve that regulates how ice from the vast Greenland Ice Sheet flows into the ocean. When its floating ice tongue destabilizes, scientists pay close attention — not just because of the spectacle, but because of what it signals for sea level rise over time.

The 2026 calving fits into a pattern of recurring large-scale events at Petermann. A 2008 calving produced 31 square kilometers of ice; the 2010 event released more than 250 square kilometers; the 2012 calving shed 130 square kilometers. Each event adds a data point to a longer story about how this glacier is changing.

One detail that stands out: Petermann’s ice islands are notably thinner and more fragile than those from other major Greenland glaciers like Jakobshavn and Helheim. Compared to the enormous tabular icebergs that break from Antarctica, they’re thinner still. That fragility becomes important once they start moving.

A slow-motion journey toward a collision

After separating from the glacier, the ice island didn’t rush anywhere. Tracked by NASA-USGS Landsat satellites, it moved down Petermann Fjord at roughly 3 kilometers per day during its first week — glaciologist Mauri Pelto of Nichols College was among those following its progress.

At the end of the fjord lies Nares Strait, a narrow channel that funnels ice southward, with Joe Island sitting directly at that exit point. A small, rocky outcrop, it has intercepted Petermann ice islands before. The 2010 precedent was hard to ignore: that year, a similarly large ice island struck Joe Island and split cleanly into two pieces. With the 2026 berg already considered fragile, researchers had reason to expect the same. Landsat 9’s OLI instrument captured the collision on August 23 and 24, giving scientists a rare real-time look at what was unfolding.

INFG Greenland s newest giant iceberg bigger than Manhattan survived a direct collision with a remote Arctic island defied all expectations 1

Against the odds: the iceberg holds together

It didn’t break.

Despite being less than 150 meters thick and described as more fragile than icebergs from comparable glaciers, the ice island survived its collision with Joe Island without fragmenting. Garbo put it plainly: “We were certainly watching closely as it interacted with Joe Island and were impressed that it survived the interaction without further fragmentation.”

Winds and surface currents did the rest. The berg pivoted away from the island and moved southwest into Nares Strait, continuing its slow journey toward open Arctic waters. That survival is temporary, though — tides, currents, and ongoing melting are steadily weakening the ice. The question isn’t if it will fracture into smaller pieces, but when and where.

Where the ice goes — and why it matters

Petermann ice islands don’t simply melt in place. Many travel significant distances through Arctic waters before running aground, and researchers have tracked previous ones drifting toward the coasts of Coburg and Baffin islands — far from where they started.

Along the way, they create real hazards. Drifting icebergs of this scale pose risks to shipping routes, marine operations, and Arctic infrastructure. A berg that survived a collision with a rocky island isn’t something vessels want to encounter unexpectedly.

There’s also a subtler effect happening beneath the surface. As the ice melts, it releases freshwater carrying the chemical and thermal signature of Greenland’s glaciers far beyond Petermann Fjord — a quiet but measurable influence on the broader Arctic system.

The 2026 ice island is still drifting as of this writing. With two large rifts still active on Petermann Glacier and the calving cycle showing no signs of slowing, scientists will keep watching — both this berg’s gradual disintegration and whatever the glacier decides to release next.

Read the whole thing?

Get the week's signal, not the noise

Our sharpest reporting on energy, climate and nature — free, once a week.

Share this article
Daniel Editor
Daniel GarciaChief Editor
Daniel García is an Editor-in-Chief with strong expertise in structural work and engineering principles. He combines this technical foundation with deep knowledge of energy, spatial design, and emerging technologies, bringing a forward-thinking and analytical approach to editorial leadership.